Communication is a central factor in our day to day lives. We chat in coffee shops, write emails, send copious amounts of text messages, and talk on the phone. These are psychological necessities in our life, the connection to others and the expression of that connection. On my bookshelves are poets who write in verse, Greek plays, Shakespeare, and letters from and to authors; all of which even the most pedantic would find tiring after a while. Despite (or maybe because of) their classic status, they are thick and hard to get into at first. Don’t get me wrong, I love them dearly nonetheless. But it seems that this is almost the requirement to enter into the mainstream literary scene–there is a certain “voice” requirement. Not meeting this requirement, the mediums of communication that we employ everyday, that we do our most beautiful and base communications by, are severally devalued in the mainstream literary scene.
As the age of technology loomed threateningly and finally arrived, so did the demise of typewriters and handwritten letters and notes. The use of emails has rendered the USPS, or “snail mail,” obsolete. There are no more letters written for pleasure. We don’t check our mail boxes for letters from friends or lovers, we check them for bills. Thus, the beauty and romance of letters, that eager feeling waiting for news to come, is gone. It’s replaced by the dull dread of reading what we owe or what’s overdue at the library. As a form of pure communication, letters are antiquated; we use email, text messages, and Facebook updates to communicate to our friends and lovers. The excitement we feel comes not in opening our P.O. boxes but in opening our email inbox or when the little red notification comes up on Facebook; but even then it arguable whether that satisfaction really lasts.
Email as a function has grown and proved itself useful, but email as an art form has remained stunted. The book of letters and journal entries from the poet Rainer Maria Rilke on my desk is proof that letters can be lyrical and full of poetry. Why isn’t this the case with the electronic equivalent? Ask yourself, do you think that email can be poetry? What emotions does a really well written email or text message elicit? Is a connection there?
Carl Steadman is one of the finest examples of using email as a literary device and an art form. He authored a series of emails, by two lovers who moved apart, both literally and figuratively. It is full of wit, humor, passion, and sadness–all the qualities I look for in a good book. The title of the piece is called, “Two Solitudes,” with a tagline that reads, “The net can be a fast and direct way to communicate. But it’s still only a connection between separate points and separate realities: it doesn’t make two things the same.” (You can read more here.)
Although you can read the entire piece on one webpage now, at the time the release was much different. He had people literally participate in the piece by adding their names to a mailing list and sending out each email in the series to them. It was as if you were one of the lovers, and someone was writing to you. Or on a more voyeuristic note, it was as if you were accidentally CC’d on each delivery. This inventive use of email as an art form is inspiring: it’s a connection to the writing and journey of the characters in an interactive form that just a book a of letters couldn’t produce. There’s something so personal and unrehearsed about sending an email, and Carl Steadman captures that in his piece.
In a similar way, Tao Lin, the Brooklyn-based “eccentric,” also captures the nearly voyeuristic sense of honesty. For some quick background that you could probably deduce from Wikipedia: Tao Lin sold shares of his new novel for $2000 each (one to his parents, one to a fan, and I can’t remember the others), which got him an interview on BBC. He helped launch Muumuu House which publishes, among other things, Gmail chats. He sells the detritus of his life and writing on Muumuu house. I myself have purchased one of these detritus packs, which I felt was probably one of the creepiest things I’ve ever done. It included a picture of his childhood dog, several pages of unpublished writing, and a very hilarious doodle of a hamster. I still have the picture of his dog. It’s on my wall and every time I look at it I immediately feel good, because I’m the only one who knows what it means.
Tao Lin is honest. He writes what he thinks in short declarative sentences. And what he thinks is distinctly familiar. Like most of us, he stays up late looking at meaningless Facebook profiles when he should be getting a solid 8 hours of rest, and he drinks iced coffee and draws hamsters. To quote Wikipedia quoting Miranda July, “Tao Lin writes from moods that less radical writers would let pass—from laziness, from vacancy, from boredom.” And those feelings—laziness, vacancy, boredom—come from nights sitting alone or from Inbox (0) or from an unreplied text message; when depression is fought off with every click and you long to talk to someone or to feel in any way satisfied. It brings to mind the Carl Steadman quotation: “The net can be a fast and direct way to communicate. But it’s still only a connection between separate points and separate realities: it doesn’t make two things the same.” The Internet is full of loneliness and people trying to absolve that emotion. Tao Lin is aware of this loneliness and disconnectedness acutely, and that’s the issue he chooses to discuss. He often uses the mediums of emails, Tumblr blogs, and most usually Gmail chats.
When I write emails or short Tumblr posts or Gchats that I know no one will ever read (except for the person on the receiving end), I’m letting something go—a layer or a part of my personality that doesn’t normally show through. At most it’s a heightened honesty, and it’s at least its just a different dimension of existence. It feels more honest, like I can be myself without anyone judging me that I actually care about. No one will give me a dirty look or “bad vibes.” Just a bad comment that I can choose to ignore or even delete. Tao Lin has captured this emotional essence in his book SHOPLIFTING FROM AMERICAN APPAREL, and that’s what captivates me the most. He almost lives in that separate dimension of existence all the time. You should buy it and see.
This feeling of isolation, possibly derived from the Internet and our modern communication system or possibly there all along, puts human connection into question. With all of these modern, quick, communication processes, do we ever make true connections with others? Is the development of email, text messaging, and instant messaging futile attempts to bridge the gap between two humans who may never be able to truly communicate anyway? These questions are pressing for the masses of teens and twentysomethings lost in the question “What are you doing?” despite the fact that maybe nobody really cares about the answer anyway. They’re pressing for me, having grown up in the blue glow of the LCD screens and a symphony of high pitched dial up—a time when the Internet had just become a pillar for humankind (aka America). Thankfully, with every good question comes art eager and ready to give an answer a try.
Whether there truly exists an answer to this question, it’s debatable. Both Carl Steadman and Tao Lin have attempted to figure out the answers for themselves; Carl Steadman, through taking the responsibility of the connection away from the device and onto the relationship, and Tao Lin, through embracing the loneliness in a type of existential disconnection. Perhaps the answer is different for each of us; maybe we’re all searching desperately for an end to the pain of loneliness and disconnection, and maybe the Internet serves to distract us from this pain for small doses of time. *Beep* a text message, relief. *Ding* an email received, relief. A Facebook message. A reply on Twitter. A new follower. A new friend request. Relief. In their own banal way, they’re an undeniably instant solace. Yes, I know every Facebook wallpost isn’t art. But perhaps it has potential for art, maybe it’s a place to explore the intense emotions that are triggered by mere binary code and graphics. That’s the essence of this literary art form, and it’s one that should be taken seriously.





